Home

About The Book

Talks & Book Signings

Reviews & Comments

Published Articles

Recommended Psychics & Mediums

Famous Quotations

About Pam Evans

Media Room

Other Books by Pam Evans

Contact Pam

 
<< Back to Published Articles list

Hard Evidence for Reincarnation
by Pamela J. Evans

as published in Open Road (a publication of Edgar Cayce Canada, Fall 2003

“This entity was once a monk,” concluded a reading for Edgar Cayce’s friend, Arthur Lammers. That startling remark sparked a new direction in Cayce’s readings that had previously specialized in health issues. At Lammers’ coaxing, Cayce began giving past life readings, which eventually added up to about a third of his 14,000 documented readings.

Although Cayce’s past life information reached thousands, North Americans needed more evidence to convince them that reincarnation is a fact. Dr. Ian Stevenson and his research team have scientifically provided the hardest evidence we have today: conscious memories and birthmark evidence of children.

Dr. Stevenson, now in his eighties, was a Professor of Psychiatry and Director of the Division of Personality Studies at the Health Sciences Center, University of Virginia. Sometimes called the Galileo of the 20th century, he has studied mostly children who consciously remembered details of past lives, providing detailed and accurate information about people who died before they (the children) were born—people they say they once were. He chose children because they can’t control the subconscious influence of a lifetime of information. There are nearly 3,000 cases on file at the University of Virginia.

Dr. Stevenson’s first book, 20 Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation (U. of Virginia Press), details children’s memories of their immediate past lives. His second book, Where Reincarnation and Biology Intersect (Praeger Publishing), is even more impressive, listing cases where the birthmarks of the children match the autopsy reports of wounds that killed the people the children say they were in past lives. Each case has details that are astonishing. The book summarizes 112 cases of birthmark evidence. The Journal of the American Medical Association supported Stevenson’s research in a 1975 article, saying that reincarnation is the most logical conclusion based on the evidence he’s presented.

Naturally, there are many skeptics, and Dr. Stevenson has answered the most common questions:

1. "Are these cases fraudulent?"
  • No. There are no financial rewards or publicity.
  • There were many witnesses—researchers, family, and acquaintances.
  • The children’s behaviour was too complex for fraud.
  • The researchers cross-examined the children for hours. After the questions, the researchers took each child to the train station in the town where they said they had lived and let them find the locations they had recalled. Not one of the children had any trouble finding his former home and recognizing his previous family. And many of them knew what had changed since they’d last been there.
  • When researchers returned unexpectedly a year later, the details of each child’s testimony were the same.
2. “Were the children fantasizing?”
  • Any fantasies were woven around facts which could be verified.
3. “Did the testimonies come from hidden information?”
  • The children were too young for this sort of influence, usually between ages two to six—and some less than two years of age.
4. “Did the stories come from genetic memory?”
  • The children provided too many details of their past lives (up to fifty, in some cases).
  • The child testifying couldn’t be a descendent of “X” (his former life) because “X” lived in a completely different family and village.
5. “Were the children using clairvoyance or telepathy?”
  • The children provided information or skills connected with only one stranger.
  • The children could remember how things used to be when they were living in their past-life locations. If they were indeed reading minds, then those minds would know about the changes.
One interesting example of birthmark evidence from Dr. Stevenson’s book involves a child in Turkey who remembered being a bandit. He’d committed suicide to escape capture by the French police. He’d done this by jamming the muzzle of his long rifle under his jaw and pulling the trigger. The interviewers found an old man who had witnessed the bandit’s death. In this life, the boy had been born with a huge gash mark under his chin. When the parents gave permission to shave the child’s head, a second gash mark just to the left of the crown of his skull indicated a trajectory that was exactly correct for the story of the bandit’s death. If such a shooting had happened in this lifetime, the victim wouldn’t have lived to tell the tale.

Stevenson’s second book contains a picture of this child and many other fascinating color photos of birth defects and unusual marks. Some look like actual scars; other deformities include missing fingers, hands or toes. Dr. Stevenson feels that there is a direct connection between the number of years between lives and the presence or absence of birthmarks. The interviewed children all had returned within a few years of their former lives. He suggests that something non-physical might convey the scars from one body to another.

Other research indicates a duplicate energy body that carries our mind, soul and spirit into the spirit world after our physical body returns to the earth. Impressive as it is that medical documents of the deceased correspond to the living child’s birthmarks—or in some cases a missing limb or other marks—it’s also hard to come up with other more feasible explanations than reincarnation. People’s birthmarks or deformities are more understandable when we know there’s a reason.

To repeat, the above evidence is by far the hardest, most objective, and most compelling evidence we have so far in support of reincarnation. Keeping this in mind, I recommend two recent books by Carol Bowman, Children’s Past Lives, and Return from Heaven. They stress that children can be healed if parents understand that past life memories might be the source of the problem.

Dr. Stevenson says, “There is an impressive body of evidence (for reincarnation), and it is getting stronger all the time. I think a rational person, if he wants, can believe in reincarnation on the basis of evidence.”

(c) Copyright 2003, Pamela J. Evans. All rights reserved.



BUY THE BOOK


Just $19.95 CDN.
Shipping is FREE!




BOOK PAM
For Speaking Engagements

Pam is available to give dynamic talks your audience won't soon forget!

Call 1-866-662-4335 for more information.





© 2002-2007 Pamela J. Evans and Shavian Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Contact Us